What they said أحمد رامي الحاج ×

The circular we issued concerns the documents that courts must obtain to determine whether a person is covered by the general amnesty law or not.

When we interpret the text itself, we proceed from the spirit of legislation and the legislator's intent, and here lies the importance of our meeting with the legislators.

The judiciary is committed to applying the law in accordance with the legislative text and the binding interpretations of the Constitutional Council.

The core issue was related to drug files

The Constitutional Council agrees with the Public Prosecution, there are absolutely no disagreements, and the decision we issued regarding the general amnesty is 100 percent consistent

The Constitutional Council interpreted ambiguous terms in the amnesty law, and we abide by them because they are consistent with the legislative text and not contrary to it.

We are committed to the Constitutional Council's interpretations because they conform to the text in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and the law, and the interpretation is an interpretation consistent with the text.

The circular issued yesterday concerns the method of implementing the amnesty as agreed before the appeal.

It does not constitute any pressure on the Constitutional Council