What they said جنبلاط ×
Direct quotes as they appeared in the news — each one links to its source.
دونالد ترامب (92)
يسرائيل كاتس (57)
غادي آيزنكوت (43)
ماركو روبيو (32)
ترامب (28)
نعيم قاسم (26)
نواف سلام (26)
بنيامين نتنياهو (25)
محمد باقر قاليباف (21)
محسن رضائي (21)
عباس عراقجي (21)
آيزنكوت (20)
جبران باسيل (18)
قاسم (16)
We can preserve ourselves amid the conflict of states through internal dialogue, and we must talk to Hezbollah — President Aoun is doing that — and I say more than that, let us talk to Iran, for there is no alternative to dialogue.
I hope we will not be on the brink of a new war, but listen to the Israelis' speeches.
Naim Qassem has no right to drag Lebanon into a new war that brings heavy losses to Lebanon.
Enough destruction of the south
We cannot remain permanently an arena of confrontation and a battlefield for Iran against Israel, or for improving Iran's conditions in the Strait of Hormuz.
Hezbollah has no right to demand the return of the explosives seized by the army at Dahir al-Baydar.
Sheikh Naim Qassem has no right to drag the country again into wars that have nothing to do with us, and the losses will be heavy.
Hezbollah has no right to demand the return of the explosives of Aizhar al-Baydar; it is unreasonable for us to remain an arena for Iran to confront Israel
General Saad El-Shazly is one of the heroes of the October War
Our condolences to the families of the victims, and we wish the wounded a speedy recovery. What is required is that diplomatic efforts resume so that security and stability return and the cycle of violence stops.
Solidarity with it is a clear position that admits no ambiguity, and we affirm its right to confront this aggression, as it has stood by Lebanon in difficult times and extended a helping hand to all Arab peoples.
We strongly condemn the Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia and affirm the Kingdom's right to confront this aggression
Only returning to the Islamabad agreements, with their development, spares the region complete ruin that major oil companies and arms companies would benefit from, and any bet on outside support is an illusion and fantasy.
Negotiating for the sake of negotiating leading to entrenching rights on the ground.
It seems we have entered a cycle of negotiating for the sake of negotiating, and at every session the Lebanese delegation will receive new demands.
The logical conclusion of the entire preceding narrative is that the Palestinian Oslo was born dead, and that the Lebanese Oslo is on the way, and that there is no limit to Israeli demands and ambitions except further expansion to control land and water, with the possibility of settlements being established.
The logical conclusion in all the previous narrative is that the Palestinian Oslo was born dead, and that the Lebanese Oslo is on the way, and that there is no limit to Israeli demands and ambitions except further expansion to control land and water, with the possibility of Oslo settlements.
It seems we have entered a cycle of negotiating for the sake of negotiating, and in every session the Lebanese delegation will receive new demands, so I advise that we benefit from the Oslo path and deepen coordination with the Ramallah district
The American withdrawal from Iraq and the illusions of sovereignty and stability
What is the legal justification for the continued detention of Dabbour? And what about his health condition?
Why is he still detained at Al-Hayat Hospital in Beirut?